| 
			 
			          If 
			one looks at what has happened in the institutional Catholic Church 
			since 1965, the year that Vatican II ended, one sees a 
			roller-coaster ride of progressive advances and regressive 
			retreats.  Since the reign (and I use that word intentionally, 
			rather than “pontificate”) of John Paul II the institution has been 
			on what some call a restorationist path.  This refers to the process 
			of restoring the Catholic Church to the splendor of the pre-Vatican 
			II days when bishops were princes, the pope was the emperor and the 
			lay people kept their mouths shut and their wallets open. 
			
			          All 
			along there has been a movement among some lay, cleric and 
			hierarchical Catholics to continue with the vision of Vatican II.  
			Today, all of the bishops in that movement in the US are either 
			dead, retired or in exile.  The “Vatican II” clergy are growing old, 
			discouraged, tired and are either retired or have left altogether.  
			They have been replaced by a couple generations of younger clergy 
			who often describe themselves as “John Paul II” priests.  Others 
			describe them as the ‘Catholic Taliban,” “the Young Nazis” or words 
			to that effect.  Lately several scholars have written about them and 
			the assessment is worse than discouraging. It’s frightening. 
			
			          The 
			need for deep reform exploded to the surface in January, 2002 with 
			the revelations in Boston that Catholic bishops had been hiding, 
			enabling and supporting sexually dysfunctional criminals in the 
			priesthood.  VOTF started off and brought with it hope, a voice for 
			anger, disillusionment and frustration.  Now we are five years down 
			the road from January 6, 2002.  This was not the beginning salvo of 
			the clergy abuse assault.  That happened in summer of 1984 with the 
			revelations in Louisiana that the bishop there had done was Bernard 
			Law had done...but Lafayette is not Boston and the Times of 
			Acadiana is not the Boston Globe. 
			
			          The 
			years since have brought staggering changes that no one expected.  
			Thus far the cost in dollars to the U.S. church that Ray Mouton, 
			Mike Peterson and I predicted.....one billion.....has been exceeded 
			and, if all the numbers were revealed honestly, it’s probably 
			doubled.  The costs for California alone, thanks to the narcissism 
			of Roger Mahony, have gone beyond a billion. 
			
			          The 
			U.S. bishops still live in their delusional world as far as clergy 
			abuse is concerned.  The Dallas Charter, the diocesan review boards, 
			the National Review Board, the Office for Child Protection.....all 
			are bureaucratic attempts to right the wrongs, make the bad memories 
			go away, restore trust and faith in the bishops and above all, 
			create the false image that it’s all over.  As Archbishop Gregory 
			said in Feb. 2004, the “the history of sexual abuse is today 
			history.”  More inaccurate words have never been spoken!   Bishops 
			continue to force victims through incredibly painful and demeaning 
			court processes in which they and their lawyers do all they can to 
			revictimize them.  In State legislatures throughout the country, 
			State Catholic Conferences and the local bishops spend millions of 
			the faithful’s dollars to defeat any legislation that would offer 
			greater protection to child victims.  They insult our collective 
			intelligence with a variety of false claims based on erroneous 
			information.  They bring in their so-called experts to tell the 
			legislatures how much they have done and how much they care and how 
			much they respect our U.S. legal system.  The bottom line is that in 
			State after State, the only opposition to child protective 
			legislation is the Catholic Church.  How ironic!  The world’s 
			largest religious organization which is based on the mission of 
			Christ and it opposes State laws that do what it not only could not 
			do, but would not do...protect children from deranged 
			predators and self-centered institutional enablers. 
			
			          What 
			about VOTF?  The past five years have been tumultuous.  The “growing 
			pains” that some members speak of are far more than that.  What we 
			have seen has been a clash between the deeply rooted clerical 
			dependency that has been systematically woven into our very being by 
			the institutional church, and Catholic Adulthood.  It’s a long, 
			excruciatingly painful process to grow up in the Catholic Church.  
			Most chronological adults never make it.  No matter how liberated 
			and avant-garde they believe themselves to be, there is still a very 
			powerful core, deep down inside, that causes dependency feelings to 
			take over whenever one is faced with the challenge of taking the 
			risk of not only thinking but acting like an adult when in the realm 
			of the Church world.  To do so means to challenge the clerical 
			office holders and to express opinions that they do not want to 
			hear.  To do so means taking the risk that some of them might try to 
			capitalize on the magical thinking that has supported their power by 
			threatening canonical penalties or equating disobedience to them 
			with disobedience to Christ.   
			
			          Jesus 
			Christ was all about love.  He also was a man of action.  Whenever 
			he encountered the religious hypocrites of his day he didn’t sit 
			down to tea with them and exchange sweet nothings so that nobody had 
			any ruffled feathers.  If he blew his top when he encountered a 
			bunch of hucksters selling birds at the temple can you imagine what 
			his reaction would have been if he’d dropped down to earth during 
			the early days of the reformation?  Martin Luther would have ended 
			up the pope and the Roman church bureaucracy would have been 
			vaporized.  What would have been his reaction had he appeared at the 
			chancery in Lafayette, LA in the summer of 1984 when the churchmen 
			and the lawyers were putting together what they thought would be 
			legal agreements that would pay off some families and insure their 
			silence.  Even better, how do you think he would have reacted 
			reading the Boston Globe on Sunday morning, January 6, 2002.....the 
			Feast of the Epiphany?  I suspect that the epiphany the Globe 
			brought that morning would have been followed by another “wake-up 
			call” of cosmic proportions.  Bernard Law might have found himself 
			propelled, not to a palace in the Vatican, but to the outer reaches 
			of Greenland to teach catechism to the natives on the edge of the 
			North Pole. 
			
			          In 
			addition to the anger, distrust, frustration, disillusionment and 
			spiritual aridity the institutional Church has caused because of its 
			totally inept response to the evil of clergy abuse, there has been 
			another equally toxic reaction and that is the profound feeling of 
			nausea in reaction to the self-serving public relations campaign of 
			the U.S. hierarchy by which they continue to try to flip the whole 
			mess around, make themselves look like victims and demonize anyone 
			who has ever challenged their collective stupidity, cruelty and 
			total lack of compassion. 
			
			          Is 
			there hope for change from within? 
			
			          As 
			far as reform etc. is concerned, I have lost all realistic hope that 
			the institution will change for the better in my lifetime. The 
			present crop of bishops, courtesy of John Paul II, is far less 
			pastoral, less theologically educated and more clericalist and 
			monarchical than any I can remember. I see no hope and only constant 
			signs of discouragement. I believe in VOTF but I do not believe that 
			they will ever accomplish any meaningful structural change.  It’s 
			simply impossible for any such change to happen unless it starts at 
			the top.  The Catholic Church is a monarchy.  Period!   Getting a 
			pastoral council up and running here and there is nothing. Sitting 
			down to tea with a bishop is no more than a sop to keep the 
			activists. They are not able or willing to bend or change their 
			approach in something as vital as clergy sexual abuse so why expect 
			them to even think about giving up any of their power in anything 
			else.  
			
			          The 
			hot button issues that the popes have told us we can’t even talk 
			about will remain discussed by lay and clergy alike and closed in 
			the minds of the pope and the bishops. All you have to do is look at 
			the stream of Vatican decrees re-introducing the pre-Vatican II 
			version of the Latin mass to stomping on theologians to get the 
			picture. The young conservatives lap it up and seem to play at 
			church as if it’s some sort of surreal dress-up game. What many 
			fed-up people are doing is simply walking away and finding an 
			alternative faith/worship opportunity that is less toxic and more 
			Christ centered.   
			
			
			                
			
			I am not much 
			interested in working for internal church reform anymore mainly 
			because my experience within the structure over the past two decades 
			has been so painfully revelatory for me. It is way too toxic. Life 
			is short and being part of the Christian community is supposed to be 
			joyful and not poisonous. I have turned to reading the books of John 
			Shelby Spong and find they give me hope and a voice to my 
			theological ideas and related feelings. I do not expect everyone to 
			be where I am at because no one else has been on my journey. As a 
			matter of fact, one of the more painful breakthroughs I have had is 
			that it’s not only inappropriate but simply wrong to project 
			that we are all on the same spiritual wave length and that some are
			right and some are fundamentally wrong about the way 
			they believe. 
			
			          I 
			don’t see any hope in trying to bring about meaningful reform of the 
			structures.  One or the other group may convince a local bishop to 
			take an enlightened approach, but then the day will come when he 
			retires and is replaced and then it’s a crap shoot as to what 
			happens. 
			
			          VOTF 
			has pledged to support Priests of Integrity.  There has to be a lot 
			more to this than words and an annual award.  There are plenty of 
			good, decent, hard-working priests out there, the center of whose 
			mission and life is not the bishop, pope or Vatican but Jesus 
			Christ.  They will never be bishops.  They need to be encouraged but 
			not pitied because these men have an inner strength that is grounded 
			in something far deeper and stronger than loyalty to the monarchical 
			system.  Maybe what VOTF needs to do is challenge the thousands of 
			priests still in denial who continue to moan and groan because the 
			identified sexual abusers make them all look bad.  Not so!  What 
			makes Catholic priests look bad is apathy, fear and apparent 
			subservience to a system that is outmoded, unproductive and enabling 
			of those who would victimize others.  How many priests have looked 
			at the landscape and privately expressed shame, disgust and anger at 
			the sexual abuse nightmare and the bishops leading role in it....and 
			how many of these same priests have refused to speak out even to a 
			small group for fear of retaliation by the bishop who can’t see past 
			the walls of his imaginary kingdom. 
			
			          VOTF 
			has pledged support for the victims of clergy sexual abuse.  This 
			should be the number one priority.  Why?  Because everything about 
			the clergy abuse nightmare is everything that is wrong with the 
			institution.  This is not one of many problems.  This is THE 
			problem.  People are now getting excited over the revelations of 
			embezzlement and financial mismanagement in Church throughout the US 
			and the world.  This is terrible, but we are talking about money 
			here and not human lives.  The sex abuse nightmare is a 
			culture of emotional and physical devastation and spiritual 
			murder.  If the local VOTF chapters can’t make support and defense 
			of victims their first priority, they should close down.  If the 
			national leadership equivocates or cowers in fear of what the 
			bishops will think if they take strong and courageous stands, they 
			need to quit. 
			
			          A 
			word of wisdom from my military days: “Either lead, follow or get 
			the hell out of the way.” 
			
			         
			I 
			respect those who continue to work for internal church reform.  I am 
			on the board of ARCC (Association for Rights for Catholic in the 
			Church).  I respect my fellow board members.  I don’t believe the 
			institutional Church cares one bit about individual rights or due 
			process when it comes to lay people or lower ranking clerics or 
			anyone who thinks creatively.  It cares greatly about protecting the 
			rights and assuring due process for those who are bishops and 
			above.....There are exceptions however.  If a bishop stands up for 
			what is right and has the courage to express his stand, he will 
			quickly find himself cast out of the sacred club and into the real 
			church with the rest of us.  Tom Gumbleton, probably the only 
			real bishop in the U.S., publicly has stood with victims.  The 
			Vatican acted quickly.  He was fired on orders from the top because 
			he “broke communio with the bishops.”  Bravo for Tom!  He did 
			what Jesus would have done. 
			
			          I 
			don’t want to expend much more energy tilting at windmills in the 
			world of Catholic Church reform.  I have no hope that it will 
			happen.  I don’t want to spend any more time trudging through what 
			can best be described as a swamp of toxic waste.  I believe change 
			will happen because it has happened over the past few years.  It has 
			not taken place through dialogue with the hierarchy however. It’s 
			happened when the Church office holders (I intentionally don’t use 
			the word leaders) have found themselves face to face with 
			powers greater than themselves like the law enforcement agencies or 
			the civil court system.    That’s where the change will take place.  
			That’s why I have consistently urged VOTF leaders to totally support 
			all efforts at legislative change that will provide greater 
			protection to victims.   
			
			          There 
			has been a vast amount of change and progress since I first became 
			involved in 1984 and especially since 2002.  The institutional 
			Church and its bishops would have done nothing to stop 
			institutionalized sexual abuse and done nothing to help the victims 
			it has known about were it not for the fact that we have forced 
			them to do something.  If good people back down and believe the 
			nonsense propagated by the public relations machines of the 
			individual dioceses and the National conference of bishops, then we 
			will be back on the road to returning to where we were in 1983.  It 
			happened before and it could happen again and it happened before 
			because the hierarchy had too much power, too much influence and too 
			little accountability.  That has changed but it hasn’t changed 
			enough.  There are still countless men and women of every age who 
			cannot come forward to disclose the devastating abuse they have 
			suffered.  As long as the clerical-celibate system remains basically 
			untouched, there will always be victims of sexually dysfunctional 
			priests and spiritually dysfunctional bishops. 
			
			          Is 
			there any hope at all?  Yes!  The hope is not in the institution or 
			in bureaucratic policies, programs or empty pronouncements.  The 
			hope is in the ever increasing number of deeply committed men and 
			women who are being compassionately present to people in need and in 
			pain.  These are the men and women of any denomination or belief 
			system or of no denomination but still with a powerful belief system 
			who work with each other to get right to the heart of Christ's 
			message without stopping at any denominational door to get approved 
			by any bishop in order to express charity.
			   |